Home/The record

The Record

The Reinstatements: Who Musk Let Back on X, and On What Basis

The Record · Policy File

In November 2022, a month after buying Twitter, Musk ran a poll asking whether suspended accounts should be readmitted provided they had not broken the law or engaged in egregious spam. Seventy-two per cent said yes. He declared an amnesty.

Roughly twelve thousand bans were reversed. The stated principle behind it is coherent and he has articulated it clearly. Its application has been inconsistent, and the inconsistencies are documented in his own posts.

Last verified
28 July 2026
Period covered
November 2022 – 2024
Subject
The reinstatement of previously suspended accounts on Twitter/X and the stated basis for it
On descriptions
Where individuals are described as neo-Nazi, white nationalist or antisemitic, those are the characterisations of the news organisations cited, attributed as such. They are not this site’s own.

The amnesty

Musk posted the poll on 24 November 2022. The question was whether Twitter should offer a general amnesty to suspended accounts, provided that they had not broken the law or engaged in egregious spam. It passed with 72% support, and he announced the amnesty would begin the following week.

The ADL, reporting on the change, noted that such a poll was vulnerable to bots, foreign influence operations and other manipulation.

Travis Brown, a Berlin-based software developer who tracks Twitter suspensions as part of a project studying extremism, logged an estimated 12,000 reversals in the period following the announcement. He described the dataset as indicative rather than definitive. It included spammers, adult content accounts, cryptocurrency promoters, sports accounts, non-English-language users, and both left-leaning and pro-Trump accounts — alongside far-right figures.

Who was readmitted

Notable reinstatements and the stated reason for the original suspension
Account Originally suspended for Reinstated
Donald Trump Encouraging the 6 January 2021 Capitol attack Nov 2022
Marjorie Taylor Greene Violating COVID-19 misinformation policy 2022
The Babylon Bee Hateful conduct policy 2022
Ye (Kanye West) Antisemitic posts 2022 — re-suspended weeks later
Andrew Anglin Banned 2013; founder of The Daily Stormer, described by CNN, NBC and Engadget as a neo-Nazi and self-professed white supremacist Dec 2022
Patrick Casey Associated with the “America First” movement; described by CNN as a white nationalist Dec 2022
Nick Fuentes Repeated rule violations, banned 2021; described by The Hill and The Independent as a white nationalist and antisemite Jan 2023 — suspended within 24 hours; reinstated again 2024
Alex Jones Abusive behaviour; permanently banned 2018 Dec 2023

Engadget and The Independent reported that at the time of his reinstatement Anglin was in hiding, having failed to satisfy a 2019 court order to pay $14 million for leading a harassment campaign against Jewish residents of Montana.

The principle, in his own words

The argument for the amnesty is not incoherent, and it deserves to be stated at its strongest. Musk set it out when reinstating Fuentes in 2024:

“I cannot claim to be a defender of free speech, but then permanently ban someone who hasn’t violated the law, no matter how much I disagree with what they say.”

“It is better to have anti whatever out in the open to be rebutted than grow simmering in the darkness.”

“This will probably cause us to lose a lot of advertisers and makes me sad, but a principle is a principle.”

Author Elon MuskPlatform XDate 2024Source 05Archive not captured
Taking the argument seriously. The position stated above — that legality rather than offensiveness should be the line, and that extreme views are less dangerous in public than in private — is a real position with a serious intellectual tradition behind it. It is held by people who find the reinstated accounts repellent. It is not answered by pointing at who benefited from it.

What can be tested is whether it was applied consistently, because a principle applied selectively is not functioning as a principle. On that, the record is documented and it is his own.

Where it was not applied consistently

Alex Jones: the reversal

In November 2022, asked to reinstate Jones, Musk refused, in personal terms:

“My firstborn child died in my arms. I felt his last heartbeat. I have no mercy for anyone who would use the deaths of children for gain, politics or fame.”

Author Elon MuskPlatform TwitterDate Nov 2022Source 04

Jones had been permanently banned in 2018 for abusive behaviour, and had been ordered to pay more than $1 billion in damages to families of the Sandy Hook victims for claiming the 2012 shooting — in which twenty children aged six and seven were killed, along with six adults — was a hoax.

Thirteen months later, in December 2023, Musk ran a poll asking whether Jones should be reinstated. Seventy per cent said yes. He posted that the people had spoken and so it would be, and Jones was back within hours. He added that he vehemently disagreed with what Jones had said about Sandy Hook, but framed the decision as a question of what kind of platform X is.

Both positions were his. Neither involved any change in Jones’s conduct or legal position. What changed was the outcome of a poll.

The same-day contrast

In December 2022, Ye was suspended for posting an image combining a swastika with a Star of David. Musk said it violated the platform’s rule against incitement to violence. On the same day, Anglin’s account was restored.

Musk had also stated at one point that he would not restore Jones’s account as a matter of personal preference — an explanation that sits awkwardly beside a rule based on legality rather than the owner’s views.

What this page does and does not say

On descriptions of individuals. The characterisations above — neo-Nazi, white nationalist, antisemite — are those of the news organisations cited, and are attributed. This site does not apply such labels in its own voice.

Reinstatement is not endorsement. Restoring an account is not evidence that the platform’s owner agrees with what is posted from it, and this page does not treat it as such. The question here is whether a stated rule was applied evenly.

Numbers are estimates. The 12,000 figure comes from an independent researcher’s dataset described by him as not definitive. X Corp has not published its own figures.

Outstanding on this page

None of the posts quoted here have been archived by us. The November 2022 amnesty poll and the December 2023 Jones poll should both be captured. Travis Brown’s dataset should be cited directly rather than through reporting of it. This page covers reinstatements up to 2024; later decisions have not been reviewed.

Sources

  1. Extremists, far right figures exploit recent changes to TwitterAnti-Defamation League · the amnesty poll and its vulnerabilities
  2. The mass unbanning of suspended Twitter users is underwayCNN Business · 8 December 2022 · range of accounts restored
  3. Elon Musk’s ‘amnesty’ pledge brings back QAnon, far-right Twitter accountsNBC News · 2 December 2022 · Travis Brown dataset, 12,000 figure
  4. Elon Musk restores X account of Alex JonesCBS News · December 2023 · both Musk positions, Sandy Hook context
  5. Musk says he’ll reinstate Nick Fuentes X accountThe Hill via AOL · the free-speech statement in full
  6. Elon Musk restores conspiracy theorist Alex Jones’ X accountPBS News · 10 December 2023 · the poll result
  7. Twitter reinstates account of Daily Stormer’s creatorEngadget · 3 December 2022 · the Montana judgment
  8. Elon Musk’s Twitter restores account of Andrew AnglinThe New Republic · 2 December 2022 · the Ye suspension on the same day

This article follows the standards set out in How This Site Sources Its Claims. If you believe anything on this page is inaccurate, please use our corrections policy and right of reply. Corrections are published, dated and logged.